AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 04.05 20:36
Top Undervalued
+30.5¢
Larry Ellison(No)
+13.6¢
Elon Musk(No)
+11¢
Mark Zuckerberg(No)
3rd richest person on December 31? AI analysis: • +30.5¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
Based on the latest Bloomberg Billionaires Index and Forbes lists, the wealth tiers among top billio...
🔓 Unlock Mispricing Insights (Pro)
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Larry Ellison
YesNo
32.55¢
67.45¢
2¢
98¢
0¢
+30.5¢
Elon Musk
YesNo
13.65¢
86.35¢
0¢
100¢
0¢
+13.6¢
Expand to view all 10 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Movers
April 3, 2026 - April 4, 2026: Larry Ellison's price surged from 13.85c to 30.65c. This was driven by anomalous liquidity fluctuations and concentrated speculative buying, completely detached from the fundamental realities of his net worth ranking.
March 5, 2026 - March 19, 2026: Jensen Huang's price sustained an abnormally high level at 33.5c, and Elon Musk's price rose from 0c to 12.5c. The reason is the market continuing its irrational exuberance from early March; capital is no longer differentiating based on fundamentals but is indiscriminately buying 'Yes' on all tech moguls. This has led to Musk (#1) and Huang (#8) being erroneously priced as high-probability candidates for the #3 spot.
Feb 28, 2026 - March 5, 2026: Larry Ellison skyrocketed from 5c to 40c, and Larry Page surged from 5.8c to 35.4c. The reason was a massive repricing event where liquidity spilled over from Musk (locked at #1) to the second tier, causing significant mispricing.
Divergence
The prediction market's pricing is severely disconnected from the objective reality of major wealth indexes (Bloomberg/Forbes). The market currently assigns a 12.65% probability to Elon Musk, who is mathematically virtually impossible to drop to #3, while also vastly overestimating distant contenders like Jensen Huang (24.5%) and Larry Ellison (24.3%). This indicates that retail capital is blindly betting based on name recognition and recent stock momentum, completely ignoring the mathematical reality of the tens of billions in net worth gaps.