AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 04.11 05:02
Top Undervalued
+40.9¢
>$36,000(No)
+40.5¢
<$23,500(No)
+36.5¢
$33,000-$36,000(No)
What will Nasdaq 100 (NDX) close at in December? AI analysis: • +40.9¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
Due to extreme illiquidity, the sum of 'Yes' prices for all mutually exclusive options in the curren...
🔓 Unlock Mispricing Insights (Pro)
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
>$36,000
YesNo
42.95¢
57.05¢
2¢
98¢
0¢
+40.9¢
<$23,500
YesNo
52.5¢
47.5¢
12¢
88¢
0¢
+40.5¢
Expand to view all 8 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Hedging
Nasdaq 100
US 10Y Yield
NVDA
QQQ
S&P 500
This event directly tracks the Nasdaq 100 index itself, so it has perfect correlation (score 5) with the index and its ETFs (like QQQ). If the outcome (e.g., significantly lower than expected) materializes, it implies a major structural market shift. It is also highly correlated with the S&P 500 and influenced by US Treasury yields (macro discount rates) and major constituent stocks (like NVDA).
Movers
April 9, 2026 - April 10, 2026, the '>$36,000' option's Yes price plummeted from 44.25c to 16.4c, due to market makers or arbitrageurs stepping in to correct the absurdly overpriced premium of this extreme bullish tail-risk option.
March 5, 2026 - March 5, 2026, the '<$23,500' option experienced a flash spike from 23.5c to 51.5c before quickly reverting, caused by a liquidity-driven 'fat finger' error or algorithmic glitch rather than a fundamental shift.
Divergence
There is a massive divergence between market pricing and common probability logic. As a set of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive options, their true probabilities must sum to 100%, yet the current total of 'Yes' prices is nearly 300%. This reflects a market entirely driven by fragmented, disorderly speculation rather than any rational consensus pricing of the Nasdaq 100's macroeconomic fundamentals.