AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 04.02 17:37
Top Undervalued
+23¢
Verlina Reynolds-Jackson(Yes)
+21.3¢
Elijah Dixon(No)
+15.5¢
Brad Cohen(No)
NJ-12 Democratic Primary Winner AI analysis: • +23¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
The market is experiencing severe premium inflation, with the sum of all 'Yes' prices reaching ~134....
🔓 Unlock Mispricing Insights (Pro)
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Verlina Reynolds-Jackson
YesNo
22¢
78¢
45¢
55¢
+23¢
0¢
Elijah Dixon
YesNo
22.25¢
77.75¢
1¢
99¢
0¢
+21.3¢
Expand to view all 11 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Movers
March 30, 2026 - April 2, 2026: Adam Hamawy surged from 6c to 27c, Adrian Mapp spiked from 4.8c to 17.4c (then settling at 15.4c), and Brad Cohen dumped from 46.5c to 31.5c. Reason: Highly unusual capital flows continue as speculators rotate funds from previously pumped candidates into other long-shots, causing widespread irrational volatility.
March 16, 2026 - March 18, 2026: Brad Cohen skyrocketed from 17.5c to 35c, Tennille R. McCoy from 2.5c to 17.9c, and Michael Anderson from 4.8c to 17.3c; simultaneously, Susan Altman plunged from 31c to 23.5c. Reason: Highly unusual capital flow detected. Buyers appear to be systematically bidding up all second-tier candidates, pushing the total market implied probability over 150%. This volatility suggests liquidity-driven speculation or manipulation rather than a fundamental shift.
Divergence
The prediction market's total implied probability of 134.4% and the erratic price spikes among second-tier candidates are completely detached from mainstream political consensus. Local political analysts generally view Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and Susan Altman as the definitive frontrunners, whereas current market capital allocation ignores district geography and actual grassroots support networks.