AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 03.30 16:44
Top Undervalued
+27.8¢
Julian Álvarez(No)
+17.9¢
Vitinha(No)
+16.7¢
Marcus Rashford(No)
UEFA Champions League: Most Goal Contributions AI analysis: • +27.8¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
The current market sum of 'Yes' prices is astronomically high at roughly 197%, indicating severe pri...
🔓 Unlock Mispricing Insights (Pro)
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Julian Álvarez
YesNo
37.85¢
62.15¢
10¢
90¢
0¢
+27.8¢
Vitinha
YesNo
22.9¢
77.1¢
5¢
95¢
0¢
+17.9¢
Expand to view all 10 options
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Rule Risk
There is a significant tie-breaker risk. The rule states that in the event of a tie without a declared official leader, the winner is determined alphabetically by last name. Since 'Goals + Assists' is a derived stat and not a primary UEFA award like the Golden Boot, UEFA may not provide an official tie-breaking ranking (e.g., based on minutes played) for this specific metric. This makes the arbitrary alphabetical resolution highly probable in a close race. Additionally, 'June 31' is a non-existent date.
Movers
March 27, 2026 - March 29, 2026: Khvicha Kvaratskhelia's price surged from 3.8c to 21.4c, driven by an outstanding performance in the recent UCL knockout stage matches, likely recording crucial goal contributions that attracted heavy retail volume.
March 11, 2026 - March 12, 2026: Michael Olise's price surged from 12.0c to 34.2c, and Marcus Rashford's price skyrocketed from 3.5c to 20.85c, while Kylian Mbappé's price plunged from 59.5c to 38.0c. This massive volatility was driven by UCL matchday results, where Olise and Rashford delivered standout performances, while Mbappé likely blanked, causing a major market repricing.
Divergence
There is an extreme logical divergence in the market. Retail bettors on prediction platforms tend to suffer from severe recency bias, buying 'Yes' shares of players who just scored in the latest matchweek. This collective buying has pushed the sum of implied probabilities to an absurd 197%. Mainstream sportsbooks and analytical models maintain a strictly constrained probability space (~100% plus margin), whereas retail traders here are completely ignoring the mutually exclusive nature of the market (only one winner is possible).