AI Signal Dashboard
Last updated: 04.12 04:02
Top Undervalued
+36¢
Republican Party(Yes)
+26¢
Democratic Party(No)
UT-03 House Election Winner AI analysis: • +36¢ undervalued • Live Prediction Market fair value & mispricing alerts.
Undervalued Options Insights:
UT-03 is an extremely conservative district in Utah (Cook PVI R+13). The core demographics make it v...
🔓 Unlock Mispricing Insights (Pro)
Real-time High Yield Opportunities
View MoreAll
Outcomes
Market
Price
AI Fair
Value
Value
Edge
Republican Party
YesNo
62¢
38¢
98¢
2¢
+36¢
0¢
Democratic Party
YesNo
28¢
72¢
2¢
98¢
0¢
+26¢
⚠️ Risk Warning: Live data may lag! Prices can shift instantly due to news or low liquidity. Before trading, use AI Chat for [Live Recalculate], [Check Liquidity], [Trollbox Radar], or review [Fair Value Logic] to verify.
Movers
April 10, 2026 - April 11, 2026: The price of the Democratic Party surged from 16c to 27.5c. This was primarily due to extremely low market liquidity, where a few speculative buy orders caused dramatic price fluctuations, rather than any substantial change in fundamentals.
March 24, 2026 - March 27, 2026: The market remained extremely calm with no significant price movements for either the Republican or Democratic Party options, and trading volume remained scarce.
March 5, 2026: The market entered a period of extreme calm, with the Republican Party price stabilizing between 79c and 80c on scarce volume, showing no reaction to external news.
Feb 9, 2026 - Feb 11, 2026: The Republican Party price remained range-bound between 78c and 80c. The Democratic Party saw minor speculative fluctuations (peaking at 27c) before retracing. Overall, the market remains in a low-liquidity stalemate and has not yet fully priced in the GOP's absolute advantage.
Divergence
There is a distinct divergence in the market. All mainstream political analysis organizations (like the Cook Political Report) rate UT-03 as 'Solid Republican.' However, the prediction market currently only assigns the Republican Party a win probability of around 84%, which is significantly lower than the mainstream consensus (close to 99%). This is largely driven by low capital efficiency in the prediction market and speculators overbetting on low-probability events.